I bet Blizzard never saw this coming! Deckard and Griswold are probably rolling over in their graves, unless they're still in some level of hell...

Thursday, October 07, 2004

Man cuts off Penis. Vol. II

After much deliberation and theory I think that I (with some participation from Chris) have narrowed the possible scenarios of this man's doings to four possible explanations.

As you can see in my comment to the first post in this matter, I think this person is lying. His explanation is clearly fallacious. The sheer mechanics disallow it; how can he cut off his own penis while trying to cut a chicken's neck? Regardless of how one takes a cutting instrument to the groin, you would have to hold the penis outsretched it order to sever it from the body, and it would most likely take some effort instead of an accidental swipe of a blade. This begs the question: why was this man's penis exposed?! Even if he was holding the chicken's neck between his legs, his penis would be above the neck of the chicken and clearly in the way...it would be obvious that one was cutting through one's own exposed penis. Then we have the obvious problem, what feather-covered chicken neck even resembles a penis? It would be blatantly obvious to anyone that the penis was being cut rather than the neck of a chicken.

Explanation 1: Man is raping chicken (thereby having a chicken in his naked crotch, this explains the exposed penis). Someone catches him and he claims that he was trying to kill the chicken. Instead of leaving it at that, and since he is probably now in love with the bird, he cuts off his own penis to create "evidence" that he was in fact trying to cut the chicken's neck and merely had an accident. Since he cut the penis, it is clearly evident that his crime was sexual in nature, otherwise he would have cut his arm or leg and never have considered cutting his genitals.

So, moving on... Chris did (through some googling) discover that a featherless chicken does exist, with a somewhat penis-resembling neck. See the following image:

However, I still claim that this particular chicken (which is from Israel) is not the one the man claims to have tried to kill.

A more likely scenario: (NEW EXPLANATION) I think the key to the whole story is the dog that apparently ate the penis immediately upon its removal from the body. In fact, I think there was no chicken when this man's penis was cut. The man was raping a dog, or was exposing his penis to a dog to have some sort of sexual relations with it. The dog bites this man's penis, removing most of it, and severely injures it. (Clearly explaining how his penis was immediately gobbled up by a dog). The man then probably runs outside screaming, and later blames all this on a chicken and simply claims the dog ate his penis once it was cut off.

Or I guess he could be telling the truth...but I think that is highly unlikely.

5 Comments:

Blogger Alexander Wolfe said...

I strongly suspect that someone has not stopped thinking about this since his first comment on it several days ago.

Oh, and it's highly disturbing to find myself in a position to be comparing a chicken's neck to male genitalia.

6:39 PM

 
Blogger adam said...

Uh John...

7:53 PM

 
Blogger Nat-Wu said...

That is an excellent analysis, John. I can see you've really done your homework on this one. Good job.

11:47 AM

 
Blogger Seamus said...

Did you ever raise any featherless chickens on your farm, Nathan?

And by the way, since you've spent a fair amount of time around both chickens and dogs, we could use your insight into the whole matter. Which scenario seems most likely to you? Or do you propose a new scenario?

12:17 PM

 
Blogger Alexander Wolfe said...

Nat-Wu is not going anywhere near a comment involving chickens, dogs, and penises.

6:10 PM

 

Post a Comment

<< Home